Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Faith Worley's avatar

Ok, this stuff is the most fun.

And heckin’ yes to this: “Show your mail some respect and you’ll start getting better quality mail.” The dream algorithm at work. 😄

Expand full comment
Joe Panzica's avatar

The most WONDERFUL whatnot about interpretations (of dreams or any other experiences or appearances) is that they) is that they can be infinitely generated.

The most HORRIFTING whatnot about interpretations (of dreams or any other experiences or appearances) …. (Imagine ditto marks here).

Before anything can be interpreted (given or ascribed “meanings”) they must first be “noted” in a special way involving some kind of description. Is a subjective/objective description more or less accurate than other forms of “representation”. (IS a description a “representation”?) The idea of “representation” brings to mind the famous painting of a pipe by Rene Magritte with the inscription “Ceci n’est pas un pipe/ This is not a pipe.”)

Descriptions are translations of experience (or appearances) into words. Appearances and experiences can also be “translated” into images, sounds, re-enactments etc. Every translation involves a certain amount of subjective distortion even when the original experience (appearance) does not generate powerful emotions or trigger visceral drives. Descriptions are no different despite how much we are able to train ourselves to separate thoughts from emotions and “facts” from judgments. Descriptions are always more or less “creative”.

Since humanity is so extensively dependent on language in how we transform the world and create cultures, we cannot help but interpret our experiences in all kinds of protective, investigative, generative, shallow, dismissive, irrelevant, and imposing ways. Sometimes when we “interpret” we imagine we are “finding” meanings inherent in the original experience or appearance. Other times is may seem as though or “interpretations” are actually more of a process of “creating” (rather than “finding”) meanings/connections/relationships and even purposes/intentions/hopes (and new fears).

When I finished reading Ulysses (for the second time: there are many sections of that freakn’ whatnot that I cannot yet read “fluently”) and was pondering that experience — a waking phrase flowed through my morning mind. I don’t remember the exact words; they came so fast and grappled me somehow. But I quickly formulated (reformulated?) it to something like “Streamly Gredible careened … “ and I choked out a novel-like whatnot from that little beginning.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts